A: Most simply explained, they are cables – of strand, wire or carbon – which are used to transfer structural load or to hold a structure in position without using piers, columns or other supports.

The cables do this by channeling, or distributing, the structure’s weight – and the ‘live loads’ generated during normal everyday usage – through another structural element, such as a bridge pylon. Cable-stayed bridges, for example, have a great potential when it comes to meeting the increasing demand for long span structures. Their advantages lie mainly in increased aerodynamic stability, reduced costs for the abutments and faster, easier construction and lightweight overall structures. However, the most important factor in ensuring the durability and performance of a cable-stayed bridge is the stay cable system.

A: Stay cables are subjected to high tensile forces and, given the fact that cable supported structures are typically very light structures, the stay cables are subjected to high stress variations, thus high fatigue resistant stay cables are of great importance. In addition, excellent corrosion protection features, replaceability of cables, installation expertise and further key factors must be observed to achieve a 100-year design life.

Targeting a 100-year life requires a high level of corrosion protection for the cables – making directly exposed cable surfaces such as locked coil and bar cables obsolete for anything other than architectural applications. Additional considerations should be given to the replaceability of the key components.

An important lesson learned on strand as well as wire stay cables – especially by owners and contractors – is that cable installation is the work of the specialist who also provides the stay cable technology. Practices of the past, where only supply of fully or partially prefabricated stay cables has been contracted to the system suppliers must be avoided.

Even newly constructed cable stayed bridges have experienced quite severe vibrations which may result in failures of cables. A careful evaluation is therefore always required and countermeasures, such as dampers are highly recommended.

Care should also be taken when designing long cables. Effects, such as the sag of the cable on the effective damping, rotational bending stresses and other effects can only be appreciated for long cables.

A: Today, the state-of-the-art and internationally versatile recommendation for stay cables is fib – International Federation for Structural Concrete, Bulletin 30, Acceptance of Stay Cable Systems using Prestressing Steels. Most modern stay cable systems have been developed and tested to these provisions including axial fatigue and subsequent tensile as well as leak tightness tests.

Specifications for stay cables have, in the past, always been covered by guidelines and recommendations, historically the most popular has been PTI – Post-tensioning Institute (USA), Recommendation for Stay Cable Design, Testing and Installation.

There are other less common and minor national recommendations such as, for example, from CIP (Setra) in France. National recommendations cover only locally available materials and construction practices and are limited to the knowledge of local suppliers, which lead to an unjustified and incorrect treatment of stay cable systems as a whole. To ensure international and legally correct tenders, such national recommendations should not be considered – they may occasionally only be used as complementary guidelines.